Australian mines · quarries · supply · historyRegister snapshot: 29 August 2026Data & source notes
Mines & QuarriesTHE AUSTRALIAN WORKING REGISTER
Transaction evidence note · WA

Telfer mine and Havieron interests

Paterson region, Western Australia · Gold · copper

Too long; didn’t read

The cited public record expressly reports completion. It records Approx. US$450m total consideration. This page does not infer the present owner, current operating status, title position or value of the asset today.

What the public record says

Greatland’s 2025 annual report records completion on 4 December 2024 of the Telfer mine, Newmont’s 70% Havieron interest and related Paterson assets. It describes approximately US$450m total consideration, including cash, shares and deferred contingent consideration; the components should not be treated as a single cash price.

Asset
Telfer mine and Havieron interests
Public date
4 Dec 2024
Buyer
Greatland Gold plc / Greatland group
Seller
Newmont subsidiaries
Recorded consideration
Approx. US$450m total consideration
Evidence
Buyer annual report and completion accounting

What “completion disclosed” establishes

It establishes that the cited company, exchange or sold-property source expressly recorded a completed transaction or sold result. It is stronger evidence than an undated marketplace badge because the public record identifies a completion event, date or formal acquisition context.

It does not automatically establish every item transferred. A transaction can involve shares, land, leases, projects, plant, contracts, data, rehabilitation obligations or several assets. The original disclosure governs the scope.

How to read the consideration

The recorded consideration is reproduced in short factual form. Cash, shares, deferred payments, contingent amounts, debt, working capital and assumed liabilities are not economically interchangeable. Where the public source did not separately disclose a value, this archive says so.

This is a historical evidence note, not a valuation comparable. A responsible comparison needs the transaction date, asset bundle, project stage, approvals, technical disclosure, liabilities and market conditions.

What still needs checking

  • The exact legal interests, land and authorities included.
  • Whether conditions, consents or third-party approvals applied.
  • How any share, contingent or deferred value was calculated.
  • The asset’s current ownership, name, operating status and obligations.
  • Any later transaction, restructure, closure, rehabilitation or relinquishment.

Add a better source

If you hold a later annual report, regulator notice, sale notice or correction, send the public link and explain the field it changes. Family or former-worker records can add context, but they remain separately attributed from legal transaction evidence.

Submit a source or correction →